<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dueling office suites, lovable software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: unifiedforever</title>
		<link>http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/#comment-1348</link>
		<dc:creator>unifiedforever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/#comment-1348</guid>
		<description>A decent amount of what you can put on the toolbar has a keyboard shortcut for its menu bar entry, though I&#039;ll agree with you that it isn&#039;t as elegant having to look elsewhere.  There really isn&#039;t any reason why toolbar buttons couldn&#039;t display the keyboard shortcut of their associated menu bar item, nor why contextual menu items also couldn&#039;t do this.  It&#039;s just sloppy, really.  Ah, well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A decent amount of what you can put on the toolbar has a keyboard shortcut for its menu bar entry, though I&#8217;ll agree with you that it isn&#8217;t as elegant having to look elsewhere.  There really isn&#8217;t any reason why toolbar buttons couldn&#8217;t display the keyboard shortcut of their associated menu bar item, nor why contextual menu items also couldn&#8217;t do this.  It&#8217;s just sloppy, really.  Ah, well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alf</title>
		<link>http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>alf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>I miss being able to access anything on the toolbar using just they keyboard, Word 2007 was amazing in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss being able to access anything on the toolbar using just they keyboard, Word 2007 was amazing in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unifiedforever</title>
		<link>http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>unifiedforever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>Pages is also Mac only, unfortunately.  But really, if there were a Windows version, you would still balk at paying for it?  If Word is really and truly something that you 1) have to use every day, and 2) loathe, then wouldn&#039;t a modest investment of $80 be worth it to dramatically improve your writing experience?

Also, Word is anything but free; just because it came with your computer or you found someone to give it to you, doesn&#039;t mean that it&#039;s free in any way, shape, or form.  If you want Word but free, try OpenOffice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pages is also Mac only, unfortunately.  But really, if there were a Windows version, you would still balk at paying for it?  If Word is really and truly something that you 1) have to use every day, and 2) loathe, then wouldn&#8217;t a modest investment of $80 be worth it to dramatically improve your writing experience?</p>
<p>Also, Word is anything but free; just because it came with your computer or you found someone to give it to you, doesn&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s free in any way, shape, or form.  If you want Word but free, try OpenOffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unifiedforever.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/dueling-office-suites-lovable-software/#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>Well that&#039;s awesome. I&#039;m utterly disgusted by Microsoft Word, which makes it super-fun that I have to use it every day. Sadly, Pages is just a wee bit out of my optimum price range (&quot;Free&quot;), So I&#039;m stuck with M.Office &#039;03 for... quite a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s awesome. I&#8217;m utterly disgusted by Microsoft Word, which makes it super-fun that I have to use it every day. Sadly, Pages is just a wee bit out of my optimum price range (&#8220;Free&#8221;), So I&#8217;m stuck with M.Office &#8216;03 for&#8230; quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
